Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Hollingsworth

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 20, 1876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Oír motion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite

Hurst, the plaintiff below, being in doubt whether his case was one to be brought here by appeal or by writ of error, took the precaution of suing out a writ of error, and also of obtaining the allowance of an appeal. At the proper time he filed a transcript of the record, and the cause was docketed by the clerk as upon a writ of error; thereupon the defendant moved to docket and dismiss the appeal. Hurst now appears and asks leave to docket his appeal. The defendant does not object to this, but, treating it as an election for Hurst to proceed here upon the appeal, moves to dismiss the writ…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Plymouth Gold Mining Co. v. Amador & Sacramento Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. United States v. Hung ChangCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  4. McFadden v. Mountain View Min. & Mill. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
  5. Courtney v. PradtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API