Legal Opinion

Winitz v. Kline

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided April 21, 1971PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Chancellor:

This is the decision on (a) a motion by a defendant to quash an order of sequestra tion on the ground that the stock seized is the property of a voting trust and not his property; and (b) plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment against the moving defendant.

A

Milton Winitz (plaintiff) is seeking an order for specific performance of a contract to which he is a party with S. Allan Kline and Vivonex Corporation, a Delaware corporation (defendants). Plaintiff alleges that he is entitled to but has not received a 2(4% equity interest in Vivonex. 1 Kline is a nonresident of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. John W. Cooney Co. v. Arlington Hotel Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1917
  2. Sands v. Lefcourt Realty CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
  3. Tracey v. FranklinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1949
  4. Buechner v. Farbenfabriken Bayer AktiengesellschaftCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1959
  5. Wightman v. San Francisco Bay Toll-Bridge Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Istituto Bancario Italiano SpA v. Hunter Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  2. U. S. Industries, Inc. v. GreggDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972
  3. Hechinger Investment Co. v. Fleet Retail Finance GroupDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
  4. Tankersley v. AlbrightDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
  5. Tuckman v. Aerosonic Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API