Legal Opinion

Craig v. Pyles

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 13, 1897PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Case 85 — Petition Ordinary

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE HAZELRIGG

delivered the opinion of the court.

The words spoken by appellee of and concerning the appellant, Katie A. Craig, wife of her co-appellant, namely, “She is a dirty bitch; she has no character, and is no account,” are not actionable words, in themselves importing, as averred in the petition, that appellant was “a whore, common prostitute, or was guilty of fornication and adultery.”

In Schurick v. Kollman, &c., 50 Ind., 336, the words spoken of the wife were that she was a d — -n b — h, meaning to charge, as is averred, a want of chastity and virtue.

The court held that the words…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schurick v. KollmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Ward v. WardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Robertson v. EdelsteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Williams v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  3. Koch v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  4. Moore v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Craver v. NortonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API