Legal Opinion

Gionfriddo v. Major League Baseball

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 2001No. A091113, A092225PublishedCited by 46 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMONS, J.

By an order separately filed, we consolidate the appeals from two related actions heard in the Superior Courts of Alameda and San Francisco Counties. In part I of this decision, we consider plaintiffs’ 1 appeal from a judgment entered in the Alameda action, following the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendants Major League Baseball, Major League Baseball Properties, Inc., and The PHoenix Communications Group, Inc. (hereafter collectively Baseball). Resolution of this appeal requires, in part, a reconciliation of the interests protected by plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Love v. Associated Newspapers, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Melendez v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
  3. Stewart v. Rolling Stone LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Perfect 10, Inc. v. Cybernet Ventures, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
  5. Marshall v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API