Faraci v. Fassulo
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Berrien; White (Charles E.), J. Summary proceedings by Antonio Faraci and others against Antonio Fassulo for the possession of leased premises. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
On April 3, 1916, one Emil Reick executed a written lease to defendant of certain premises in the city of Benton Harbor, consisting of a store room and basement, for the term of two years from April 1st of that year, to be occupied for a barber shop. It provided for an “annual rent of $144 in 12 monthly installments,” payable on the first day of each month. The lease was in the usual form, except that it included a clause creating a chattel mortgage on “all goods, wares and merchandise, household furniture, fixtures or other property which are or shall be placed in or on said premises by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scott v. BeecherMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Huntington v. ParkhurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Schneider v. LordMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Withnell v. PetzoldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- Barlum v. BergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rice v. Atkinson, Deacon, Elliott Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- In Re MacOmb Occupational Health Care, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Glocksine v. MalleckMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Kokalis v. WhitehurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Baker v. StorieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.