Legal Opinion
In re: Leonard Sapp
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 7, 2016No. 16-13338-JPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE PANEL:
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h) and 2244(b)(3)(A), Leonard Sapp has filed an application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such authorization may be granted only if this Court certifies that the second or successive motion contains a claim involving:(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- United States v. Calvin MatchettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Keith Lamont Jordan v. Secretary, DOCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- In re: Marvin GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Willie B. Smith, III v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Stoney Lester v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- In re: Octavious WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. SavageDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.