Legal Opinion

Dowhan v. Brockman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 2001No. 20000249PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Dr. Thomas P. Dowhan appealed an order denying a motion to modify a damage award, a judgment, and an order overruling objections to an award of costs and disbursements in his action -against Dr. Ronald J. Brockman and Valley Vision Clinic, Ltd. (“Clinic”). We affirm.

[¶ 2] Dowhan leased office space from the Clinic, which provided eye care in Grand Forks. Ophthalmologists Dowhan and Brockman entered into a pre-partnership agreement in 1994, which was renewable each year, subject to termination upon 60 days notice. The pre-partnership agreement was terminated in 1995, 1…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Amarillo v. Glick, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
  2. Lemer v. CampbellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Roise v. KurtzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Foss Alaska Line, Inc. v. Northland Services, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Overboe v. OdegaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. WFND, LLC v. Fargo Marc, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Nesvig v. NesvigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Strand v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Morris v. MollerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Van Sickle v. Hallmark & Associates, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API