Legal Opinion
Moorhead v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 27, 1989No. 88-27VPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION1
LYDON, Senior Judge.
This vaccine case comes before the court on the objections of respondent Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to the Report of the Special Master. The Report of the Special Master was filed on October 5, 1989, pursuant to § 300aa-12(c)(2)(E) of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l et seq., as amended, (Supp. V 1987) (Vaccine Act). The Special Master found that petitioners John and Carolyn Moorhead were entitled to compensation under the Act for injuries suffered by their minor son Donald, which were…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Ass'n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Nicholas C. Synan v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sabella v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Guy v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Gruber ex rel. Gruber v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Scharfenberger v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Bunting ex rel. Bunting v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.