Legal Opinion

Mattis v. Boggs

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for Washington county. Tried below before Nevile, J.

1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.

This cause was originally submitted without brief or argument by counsel for either side, and upon a voluminous record. The court, upon examination of the case without the assistance of counsel, overruled the decision in the case of Crook v. Vandervoort, 13 Neb., 505, and rendered judgment reversing the case. The opinion was written and tiled, and was published in 25 N. W. Rep., 616. A motion for a rehearing was then made, in which the attention of the court was called to the oversight, when the opinion was withdrawn from the files and a rehearing granted.* The cause is now submitted, as it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bush v. BradleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1810
  2. Dolph v. BarneyOregon Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Barrett v. FrenchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1815
  4. Gray v. GivensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  5. Allen v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1826

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kirk v. BowlingNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Moppin v. NortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Williams v. Coal Creek Mining & Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Johnson v. HardyNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Chalupa v. Tri-State Land Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API