Legal Opinion

Mazzone v. Attorney General

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 2, 2000PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

The plaintiffs3 filed a complaint in the Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk County seeking relief in the nature of certiorari and mandamus against the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Commonwealth (Secretary). The plaintiffs challenge the Attorney General’s certification, pursuant to art. 48, The Initiative, Part II, § 3, of the Amendments to the Massachusetts Constitution, as amended by art. 74 of the Amendments, of Initiative Petition 99-10, “An Act to expand the scope of the commonwealth’s drug treatment program and provide funding through fines for drug violations and the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Tax Commissioner v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Bowe v. Secretary of CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. McDuffy v. Secretary of the Executive Office of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. BrandanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Strauss v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Bates v. Director of the Office of Campaign & Political FinanceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. Regis College v. Town of WestonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  4. Albano v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Abdow v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API