Legal Opinion

Martin v. Grand Trunk Railway of Canada

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 13, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On exceptions. The case appears in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitehouse, J.

This is an action to recover damages for an injury to the plaintiff’s wood and timber resulting from fire communicated by a locomotive engine in the use of the defendant railway company.

The declaration in the plaintiff’s writ contains no averment of negligence on the part of the defendant company, but is based solely on section 64, chapter 51, of the Revised Statutes, which reads as follows : " When a building or other property is injured by fire communicated by a locomotive engine, the corporation using it is responsible for such injury, and it has an insurable interest in the property along…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Finks v. Maine State Highway CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  2. E. L. Cleveland Co. v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
  3. Hurd v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1957
  4. Beard v. BostonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API