Legal Opinion

Beard v. Boston

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 30, 1955No. 4391Published

1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.

R. L., c. 300, s. 1, provides that “the proprietors of every railroad shall be liable for all damages to any person or property by fire or steam from any locomotive or other engine upon their road.” Section 2 reads as follows: “Such proprietors shall have an insurable interest in all property situate upon the line of their road which is exposed to such damage, and they may effect insurance thereon for their own benefit.” By virtue of section 1 the defendant is liable as an insurer for such damages. Hooksett v. Concord Railroad, 38 N. H. 242, 245; Rowell v. Railroad, 57 N. H. 132; State v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pratt v. Atlantic & St. Lawrence RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1856
  2. Martin v. Grand Trunk Railway of CanadaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API