Legal Opinion

Hurd v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 31, 1957No. 4504PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.

R. L., c. 300, s. 1 (now RSA 380:1) provides that “the proprietors of every railroad shall be liable for all damages to any person or property by fire or steam from any locomotive or other engine upon their road.” It was decided in Beard v. Railroad, supra, 472, that the liability imposed thereby on the railroad “was intended to apply only to those persons or properties for which the operation of the railroad could foreseeably constitute an extra hazard of injury or destruction by fire.” It was also stated therein that in “determining whether the properties of the various plaintiffs fell…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New England Box Co. v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Martin v. Grand Trunk Railway of CanadaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895
  3. Dyer v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1904
  4. Lowney v. New Brunswick Railway Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MacLeod v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. Taylor v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
  3. McGrath v. USADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997
  4. Strassman v. Lakeshore Const.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
  5. Young v. Abalene Pest Control Services, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API