Pryatel v. J.S.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] J.S. appealed from a district court order authorizing his continued treatment at the North Dakota State Hospital for one year, until June 11, 2004, or until further order of the court. We conclude the district court’s finding that less restrictive alternative treatment for J.S. is inappropriate at this time is supported by clear and convincing evidence and is not clearly erroneous. We affirm.
[¶ 2] J.S. has lived at the State Hospital in Jamestown since October 6, 1989, and the history of his mental and physical illnesses is documented in numerous appeals to this Court.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Castillo v. D.Z.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- M.K. v. J.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Van Valkenburg v. J.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Abordo v. J.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re JsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re JsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006