People v. Dorler
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
Review of Raynor’s trial testimony, including his readiness to there accept the accuracy of the version of the events he had tendered to the police and his earlier Grand Jury testimony, indicates that whether he was an accomplice of the defendant within the compass df GPL 60.22 (subd 2) was a question of fact. It, therefore, was error for the trial *833court to deny defendant’s request that it charge the jury to that effect.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler,…
2Cited by9 opinions
- People v. VatajNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. SageNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.