Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1989PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

On appeal defendant contends that the trial court erred in refusing his request to submit to the jury the factual issue of whether the principal prosecution witness, Steven Langhorne, was an accomplice under CPL 60.22 (2) (a). We agree with the Appellate Division that the request was properly denied.

Defendant was indicted for the crimes of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees. At trial, Langhorne testified that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. VatajNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. DorlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. DemascoNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. WeeksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. People v. SageNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. People v. MajorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. People v. KingsberryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API