Legal Opinion

Flodman v. Robinson

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 2015No. A-14-510Published

1Opinion of the Court

Decisions of the Nebraska Court of Appeals FLODMAN v. ROBINSON 943 Cite as

22 Neb. App. 943

in danger. Butler had no way of determining whether or not the passenger was in need of assistance without conducting a stop of Rohde’s vehicle, and he was not required to delay an attempt to determine if assistance was needed in order to obtain a warrant and, in fact, could have been considered der- elict had he failed to act promptly to ascertain if the passenger was in need of assist­ance. See State v. Moore, 129 Wash. App. 870,

120 P.3d 635

(2005). Thus, considering the totality of the circumstances…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Henriksen v. GleasonNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Wright Bros. Builders, Inc. v. DowlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Hara v. ReichertNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. KulaNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. StarrNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API