Legal Opinion

Raska v. Tulsa Tiling Service

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 15, 1964No. 40774PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

The primary question to be determined in this original action is whether there is competent medical evidence to support the order of the State Industrial Court awarding compensation to Godfrey J. Raska, claimant, on the basis of 40 per cent permanent partial disability to the body as a whole.

The record discloses that on October 9, 1961, claimant filed a claim before the State Industrial Court against Tulsa Tiling Service, employer, and its insurance carrier, Mid-Continent Casualty Company, as respondents. He alleged that on August 21, 1961, he sustained an accidental injury…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wade Lahar Construction Company v. HowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  2. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Anderson v. Bills Bakeries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. Nuway Laundry Company v. HackerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Townley's Dairy v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. AMF Tubescope Company v. HatchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Yocum v. Greenbriar Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  3. Bama Pie, Ltd. v. RaesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Flint Construction Company v. WoodsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Griffin v. Flint Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API