Legal Opinion
Edmunds v. Valley Circle Estates
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 1993No. B059755PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), J.
A minority partner sued to recover his share of the proceeds of a sale of partnership property which occurred after he withdrew from the partnership, claiming he had relied on the majority partner’s representation that he intended to develop the property and would not sell it in bulk to third persons. The issue on this appeal is whether the representation supports appellants’ claim of constructive fraud. We hold that it does not.
Statement of Facts
Arthur E. Edmunds and Edward K. Zuckerman were lawyers, builders, and first cousins. In 1963, Edmunds and Zuckerman formed a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Laux v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Estate of ArbuckleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Borba v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re: Charles Michael Harmon, Debtor. Charles Michael Harmon v. Donald KobrinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Magpali v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- D'Elia v. Rice Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2006
- Marzec v. Cal. Public Employees' Retirement System CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Medina v. Sarkisian CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.