Legal Opinion

George v. City of Morro Bay (In re George)

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 15, 2002No. 01-56445PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

2Per curiam

ORDER

The opinion filed on August 15, 2002 [298 F.3d 1160] is amended as follows:

Slip Opinion, p. 12005, ¶ 1 [298 F.3d at 1161], delete the last sentence in the paragraph and replace with the following:

“We affirm the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s dismissal of all federal claims.”

Slip Opinion, pp. 12010-11[298 F.3d at 1164], §§ C and III, delete both sections entirely and replace with the following:

C. Request for Attorneys’ Fees and Double Costs

In the answering brief, the city defendants request attorneys’ fees and double costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1912 and Federal…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Henderson v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Al-Torki v. KaempenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Ralph J. Maisano, III and Audrey D. Maisano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. George v. City of Morro Bay (In re George)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Perry v. U.S. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API