Perry v. U.S. Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Plaintiffs-AppeUants George and Christina Perry appeal a decision of the district court, dismissing their complaint against Defendants-Appellees U.S. Bank National and U.S. Bank of Idaho. Appellants contend that the district court erred in concluding that criminal contempt is not available as a remedy for a violation of a bankruptcy discharge injunction. We have jurisdiction over the final order of the district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The district court’s dismissal of the complaint is reviewed de novo. See Decker v. Advantage Fund Ltd., 362 F.3d 593, 595-96 (9th…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Decker v. Advantage Fund Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Carole M. Rein Paul M. Driscoll William F. Croce Tina W. Croce and Paul Frenette v. Providian Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Rey L. BayonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Olson v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.