Legal Opinion
Al-Torki v. Kaempen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 5, 1996No. 94-55538PublishedCited by 143 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge.
The issue in this appeal is whether an order for a new trial is reviewable, if the party who prevailed at the first trial has his claims dismissed for failure to prosecute in the second.
*1383FACTS
Kaempen invented and patented technology for fiberglass pipes useful in the oil industry. In March 1982, Al-Torki and Kaempen entered into a contract granting Al-Torki an exclusive license in certain countries to the patented technology. The parties called this the “Muslim Contract,” because the countries in which Al-Torki was to enjoy exclusive rights were Muslim. This contract…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ann J. Malone v. United States Postal Service, an Agency of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Henderson v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Hiram Ash v. Eugene CvetkovCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Meadows v. Dominican RepublicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- Omstead v. Dell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Hearns v. San Bernardino Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- John's Insulation, Inc. v. L. Addison & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- John Bethel v. McAllister Brothers, Inc. Frank J. Huesser Thomas Bethel, as Administrator of the Estate of John BethelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- James Brown v. Rawson-Neal Psychiatric Hosp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.