Legal Opinion
Milad Allaham v. Fadi Naddaf
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 17, 2015No. 15-2575UnpublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION *
VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Milad Allaham has brought suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against three foreign nationals: Fadi Naddaf, Elias Nadaf, and Majd Nadaf. Allaham sought a default judgment, which the District Court ultimately denied for lack of personal jurisdiction. Allaham now appeals the denial of his Motion for Reconsideration. We will affirm the decision of the District Court.
I. Factual Background and Procedural History
A. Factual Background
At some time shortly before 2007, Raouaeh Nadaf, 1 Allaham’s wife, approached…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, LLC v. ECHEVERRIDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- ABOVE AND BEYOND - BUSINESS TOOLS AND SERVICES FOR ENTREPRENEURS, INC. v. TRUMBODistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- AFFILIATED ORTHOPAEDIC SPECIALISTS, PA v. ADVANTEK BENEFIT ADMINISTRATORSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. GETFVP LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- ASHLAND SPECIALTY INGREDIENTS G.P. v. ANTHEM SOUTH, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.