Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McCourt

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 10, 2002No. 99-P-1811PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcHugh, J.

At trial, the Commonwealth’s evidence persuaded the jury that the defendant raped and beat the victim in the predawn hours of a cold winter morning. From his resulting convictions of aggravated rape, attempted murder, assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon, and indecent assault and battery, the defendant appeals. He claims, principally, that his motion for a required finding of not guilty on the charge of aggravated rape should have been allowed because all of the aggravating acts occurred after he had had sexual intercourse with the victim.1 Constrained to agree, we vacate his…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. People v. McKennaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. MoffettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Selectmen of Topsfield v. State Racing CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McCourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. LeggettMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  3. Doe v. KellerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  4. Alvin Campbell v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API