Jeanne M. Murray v. Robert L. Kunzig, Administrator, General Services
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1DissentRobb, Circuit Judge
The majority concedes that Mrs. Murray did not exhaust her administrative ■remedies under the Civil Service Commission regulations (See 5 C.F.R. §§ 315.801-315.807 (1971)) before seeking injunctive relief in the district court. The majority opinion also recognizes the established doctrine that a court may not intervene with a decision on the merits before administrative remedies have been exhausted. See, e. g., Young *881v. Higley, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 122, 220 F. 2d 487 (1955); Green v. Baughman, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 291, 214 F.2d 878 (1954); Johnson v. Nelson, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 98, 180 F.2d 386, cert.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- West India Fruit & Steamship Co. v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Reeber v. RossellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.