Legal Opinion

People v. Raviart

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 26, 2001No. C034739PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NICHOLSON, J.

Defendant Danny George Raviart was convicted by a jury of two counts of robbery, one count of being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm, one count of possession of methamphetamine, and two counts of assault with a firearm on a peace officer. On appeal, defendant contends there was insufficient evidence to support one of his assault convictions and the jury was improperly instructed on the elements of assault. He also contends the trial court committed misconduct by intervening in the examination of witnesses. We affirm the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Spruance v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. People v. CorriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. People v. CarlucciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. HartschCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. ChanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. RivaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Willis Creech v. Scott FrauenheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. People v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API