Legal Opinion

Willis Creech v. Scott Frauenheim

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 31, 2015No. 13-16709PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAEZ, Circuit Judge:

Willis Lavone Creech appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition challenging his convictions for assault with a firearm and child endangerment. He challenges his convictions on the basis of alleged violations of his Fourteenth Amendment Due Process rights. Creech also challenges his sentence under California’s determinate sentencing law as a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial. We hold that it was not unreasonable for the California Court of Appeal to conclude that there was sufficient evidence for a rational trier…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. (HC) Buckley v. MacomberDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  2. (HC) Morehouse v. WardenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  3. (HC) Ortiz v. GasteloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (HC) Serratos v. People of the State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. Narcisse v. ValenzuelaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API