Legal Opinion

Vocu v. Eells

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action to recover damages for alleged fraudulent representations made by one of the defendants in purchasing certain real property from plaintiff. The jury returned a verdict of $2,750 general damages against all of the defendants (partners) and $2,500 punitive damages against Pritchett who made the alleged misrepresentations. Defendants appeal from a judgment entered on the verdict.

Plaintiff was the owner of a dwelling house and lot in Portland which she desired to sell. The property was subject to a mortgage executed to Seeurities-Intermountain, Inc. The mortgage was assigned to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dean v. ColeOregon Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WalterOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API