Legal Opinion
Hydrotex Industries v. Floyd
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 18, 1946No. 4-7832PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobins, J.
Appellants brought this suit against appellee to recover $488.90, the purchase price of two shipments of liquid roof coating sold and delivered by appellants to appellee. Appellee answered, denying generally all allegations of the complaint, and also set up a counterclaim for damages alleged to have been sustained by him on account of defective condition of the roofing material.
The case was tried to a jury, who returned a verdict, not allowing appellee any damages, but disallowing appellants ’ claim for purchase price of the roofing material. From judgment entered on this verdict appellants…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- French v. ViningMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Brantley v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Main v. DearingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Kirby v. Gibson Refrigerator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- S. F. Bowser & Co. v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. H. R. Henderson & Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1948
- Hydrotex Industries v. SharpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Interstate Grocer Co. v. Southern Shell Fish Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Veronica Ellis and Pacesetter Builders, Inc. D/B/A Coldwell Banker Pacesetter Steel Realtors v. Dr. Ron Schlimmer and Tana Schlimmer, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.