Legal Opinion

Hydrotex Industries v. Sharp

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 9, 1948No. 4-8424PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

This appeal involves the question of an implied warranty.

In October, 1944, appellees, (lien Sharp and Herman Young, were partners engaged in painting houses and other buildings in Lee county, Arkansas; and appellant was engaged in the manufacture and distribution of paint and kindred products, with its home office in Dallas, Texas. By two orders — one dated October 24, 1944, and the other, October 31, 1944 — appellees, for use in their work, ordered from the appellant certain of its paint at the total invoice price of $940.60. These were written orders solicited from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. S. F. Bowser & Co. v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Hydrotex Industries v. FloydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  3. Missouri Paint & Varnish Co. v. MerckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. H. R. Henderson & Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
  2. WAWAK V. STEWARTSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. Wawak v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Wawak v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API