Legal Opinion

Bank of Pocahontas v. Ferimer

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 21, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

The Bank of Pocahontas instituted a suit against Ferimer and others for the purpose of setting aside as fraudulent, two deeds of trust which had been executed to secure two creditors; one to secure J. Shein the payment of $19,200, and the other to secure Rachel G. Russak the payment of $10,000. From a decree in which the chancellor held thát the two deeds of trust were valid and binding, the bank has appealed.

Ferimer was a nephew of J. Shein and also a nephew of, Rachel G. Russak. He was indebted to the bank for several substantial sums which were evidenced by his notes and represented money…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hutcheson v. Savings Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  2. New York Life Insurance v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  3. Williams v. Lord & RobinsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
  4. Johnson v. LucasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  5. Lucas v. Clafflin & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Abbott, Proctor & PaineDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1968
  2. Green Hill Corp. v. Kim (In Re Kim)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
  3. Kubli v. Westwood Buildings L.P.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2021
  4. Steadman v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Steadman v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API