Legal Opinion
In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided November 19, 2015No. Case No. 1:10 MD 2196PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*682MEMORANDUM OPINION. AND ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT MOTIONS
JACK ZOUHARY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Introduction
The Direct Purchaser Class moves for final approval of six class settlements, entered into with Defendants FFP Holdings, LLC, Foamex Innovations, Inc., Future Foam, Inc., Hickory Springs Manufacturing Co.', Mohawk Industries Inc., and the Woodbridge Defendants (Doc. 1828). Direct Purchaser Class Counsel move for an award of attorney fees, reimbursement of expenses, and incentive awards for representative Plaintiffs (Doc. 1830). And Direct Action Plaintiff Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Humphrey v. First Century BankcorpDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
- Raymo v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- The Government of Puerto Rico v. The Carpenter CompanyDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020
- The Government of Puerto Rico v. The Carpenter CompanyDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020