Legal Opinion
Meyer v. City and County of Honolulu
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided September 17, 1986No. 10705PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
TANAKA, J.
Plaintiffs James Meyer (Meyer), Abel Wood, Jr. (Wood), Francis Pustka (Pustka), and P & S Pacific, Inc. (P & S) (collectively Plaintiffs) appeal from (1) the summary judgment in favor of defendant City and County of Honolulu (City) 1 and Francis Keala (Keala) and (2) the judgment based on the jury’s special verdict in favor of defendants Modesto Ramos, Jr. (Ramos) and Robert Burns (Burns). Plaintiffs contend that (1) the trial court erred in granting the summary judgment because there were genuine issues of material fact for the jury to resolve and (2) the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brandon v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Briley v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Waller v. ButkovichDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1984
- Lussier v. Mau-Van Development, Inc. IHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pele Defense Fund v. PatyHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- Hac v. University of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
- Reed v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. KealohaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2000
- North Kenai Peninsula Road Maintenance Service Area v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.