Legal Opinion

Briley v. California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 19, 1977No. 75-2753PublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

Ronald Warren Briley appeals from the dismissal of his action for damages brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3). For the reasons stated below, we affirm in part, and vacate and remand in part.

Facts and Proceedings Below

In 1960, Briley, a first offender, was arrested and charged in a California grand jury indictment with child molestation. He alleges that, pursuant to a “plea bargain” entered into with the district attorney’s office, he was allowed to plead guilty to a lesser charge with sentence suspended, provided that he consent to a castration for which he would…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Freddie Sevier v. Kenneth TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  4. Friedman v. Estate of PresserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. Briley v. State Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API