Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. McNamara

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1929No. Docket No. 7115PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J., pro tem.

Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff against appellant, entered pursuant to the verdict of a jury, for damages received by plaintiff in a collision between a laundry truck driven by him and an automobile driven by appellant.

At the place of collision the main coast highway between Los Angeles and Santa Barbara runs approximately east and west and is crossed practically at a right angle by another public highway called Butterfly Lane.

Plaintiff and respondent on the morning of the collision was driving westerly on the coast highway and defendant and appellant drove northerly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pope v. HalpernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Vickerson v. Standard Auto Sales Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Whitley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Butcher v. BrouwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Carbone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Hammond v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Thomas v. DriscollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API