Legal Opinion

Singh v. Kashian

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1954No. Civ. A. 21PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, J.

This is an appeal by M. Kashian and A. Shuklian from a judgment for $1,000 which the trial court granted to the plaintiff against the two appellants and a third defendant who has not appealed, Aram Joseph, Jr., as executor of the estate of Aram Joseph, also known as Aram Hovsepian.

The evidentiary record on appeal consists of a settled state ment, prepared under rule 7 of the Rules on Appeal from Municipal Courts in Civil Cases, instead of a reporter’s transcript.

At the outset, the respondent moved for a dismissal of the appeal (rule 4, Revised Appellate Department Rules; rule 13(c), Rules on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Powers v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Flandreau v. DowneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Milstein v. SartainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Deicher v. CorkeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. J & J Builders Supply v. CaffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API