Legal Opinion

State v. Canatella

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 4, 1950No. 3893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

Each respondent was charged with the taking of “Eighteen ($.18.00) Dollars of the lawful currency and money of the United States of America of the value of Eighteen ($18.00) Dollars of the goods and chattels” of the complaining witness. While exceptions to the denial of the motions to quash for insufficient description of the offense charged have not been argued by the respondents, their brief indicates the basis of the exceptions to be an alleged insufficiency in the description of the money taken. Under the early cases of Hamblett v. State, 18 N. H. 384, and Ford v. State, 20 N. H. 404, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The People v. GouldIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Lebowitch v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  3. State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  4. State v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1898
  5. People v. NolanIllinois Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CobbSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  2. Davis v. TraubNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  4. State v. ManneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  5. State v. PondSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API