Legal Opinion
Pro Axess, Inc. v. Orlux Distribution, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 8, 2005No. 03-4179, 03-4189PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
This case arises from a contract dispute between Defendant Sporoptic Pouilloux, S.A. (“Sporoptic”), 1 a French company, and Plaintiff Pro Axess, Inc. (“Pro Axess”), a Utah corporation. The parties raise cross-appeals from a judgment and an associated order entered following a jury trial. Spo-roptic, which was held liable for breach of contract, contests the district court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction over it. Pro Axess, the prevailing party below, appeals the district court’s denial of its post-trial motion for prejudgment interest. We AFFIRM the district court’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Trujillo v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Dudnikov v. Chalk & Vermilion Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Bartile Roofs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Old Republic Insurance Co. v. Continental Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.