Legal Opinion

True v. Wisniowski

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 5, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

The plaintiff brought this action against a creditor of her former husband, seeking removal of an attachment on real estate originally owned by the plaintiff and her former husband as tenants by the entirety. Based on a stipulation of the parties, a judge of the Probate Court allowed the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and ordered the creditor to discharge the attachment. We reverse, as there is nothing in the stipulation which entitles the plaintiff to a discharge.

The stipulation was entered “for the purpose” of the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and sets forth the following…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Foster v. EvansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Debral Realty, Inc. v. DiChiaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. General Builders Supply Co. v. Arlington Co-Operative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Kahler v. Town of MarshfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  5. Itek Corp. v. McEnnessMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re PinaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  2. Feldman v. FeldmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Heller v. Turner Bros. Construction, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  4. St. Mary's Credit Union v. MavreticMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API