Legal Opinion

St. Mary's Credit Union v. Mavretic

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided June 22, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.

This is an action in interpleader to determine which of the named defendants was entitled to surplus funds remaining after a foreclosure sale by the plaintiff. Upon the defendants’ cross motions for summary judgment, the court ruled that the funds should be distributed to defendant Anton Mavretic (“Mavretic”). Defendant First Deposit National Bank (“First Deposit") thereafter filed this Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A, Rule 8A appeal of the court’s Mass. R. Civ. R, Rule 56 ruling.

In 1993, St. Mary’s Credit Union (“St. Mary’s”) filed civil action no. 9321-CV-008 in the Marlborough Division, of the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Kurker v. HellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  2. Town of Brookline v. GoldsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Quaranto v. SilvermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  4. Bushnell v. BushnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. New Hampshire Insurance v. McCannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Lumber Co. v. EpsteinMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
  2. MacDonald v. City of EverettMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API