Legal Opinion
Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. v. State
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 1957No. 34044PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.
The question for our decision is whether respondent is liable for payment of the business and occupation tax as a manufacturer, as defined in RCW 82.04.110 and 82.04.120.
Respondent paid, under protest, the tax as assessed by the tax commission of the state of Washington, and sued the state to recover the amount thereof. At the trial, the parties filed a stipulation containing the agreed facts. After argument the trial court made its findings of fact and conclusions of law, upon the basis of which it entered judgment for respondent in the sum of $20,809.95. The state has appealed, and by its…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Frozen Food ExpressSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Fisher Flouring Mills Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Buffelen Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Drury the Tailor v. JennerWashington Supreme Court · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Beare Co. v. Tennessee Department of RevenueTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1992
- In Re Tax Appeal of Collingwood Grain, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- Perdue Foods, Inc. v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Bornstein Sea Foods, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.