Legal Opinion

Drury the Tailor v. Jenner

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1942No. 28587PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

Drury the Tailor, a corporation, insti-

tuted this action against T. M. Jenner and T. S. Hedges, as tax commissioners of the state' of Washington, to obtain a refund of the sum of $285.66, paid by plaintiff to the state, as a tax on its business activity as a manufacturer, pursuant to an assessment made by the tax commission under chapter 180, p. 706, Laws of 1935 (commonly known as the business and occupation tax law), as amended by chapter 225, p. 976, Laws of 1939 (Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 8370-4 [P. C. § 7030-64]). Plaintiff in its complaint also asked that the tax commission be enjoined…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Bacich v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State Ex Rel. Stiner v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Texas Company v. CohnWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Supply Laundry Co. v. JennerWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State Ex Rel. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. HennefordWashington Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Burns v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Impecoven v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API