Legal Opinion
Leviten v. Sandbank
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 2, 1943PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lehman, Ch. J.
The respondent, Michael Lessin, was retained in 1935 by the plaintiff, Samuel Leviten, to collect the sum of $11,508.96 which he claimed was due to him from William Sandbank. The moneys due were secured by collateral, assigned, but not delivered, to the plaintiff by Sandbank. Two notes for $3,000 made by Pat Realty Corp., to the order of Sandbank and some stock certificates were included in the collateral described in the assignment. The respondent in 1936 began an action on behalf of the petitioner • in the Supreme Court in New York County to compel the delivery of these…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robinson v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Dunn v. Hudson River Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- In re WinklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
3Cited by36 opinions
- Marsh, Day & Calhoun v. SolomonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Goldman v. Rafel Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Upgrade Corp. v. Michigan Carton Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Morse v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1948
- Lucky-Goldstar International (America), Inc. v. International Manufacturing Sales Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.