Legal Opinion

Grimes v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1892No. 451PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

New, J. —

The appellant was the plaintiff below. The complaint, the caption omitted, is as follows:

" The plaintiff complains of the defendant, and says that defendant is a railroad corporation, duly organized and incorporated under the laws of the State of Indiana; that as such corporation it is the owner of a line of railroad running through the State of Indiana, and is known and desig*574nated by the corporate name of the Louisville, Rew Albany and Chicago Railway Company; that defendant’s line of railroad runs through the town of Ladoga, which is one of the stations where defendant has one of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ring v. . City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Bassett v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  3. Billman v. Indianapolis, Cincinnati & Lafayette RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Davis v. Mercer Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SlaughterIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Knouff v. City of LogansportIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. City of Indianapolis Etc. v. WalkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Paul v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API