Legal Opinion

Tripp & Moore Boot & Shoe Co. v. Martin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Wyandotte District Court. The opinion contains a sufficient statement of the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HortoN, C. J.:

This was an action by the Tripp & Moore Boot and Shoe Company against Joseph Martin upon an account for boots and shoes, amounting to $791.47 and interest. The answer of the defendant set up: First, a general denial; second, payment; third, payment by E. M. Sharp, deceased; fourth, a counterclaim for $400. A jury was waived, and trial had before the court, on October 20, 1887. A general finding was made for the defendant, and judgment rendered in his favor for costs. The plaintiff excepted, and brings the case here.

A preliminary question…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Atchison v. BartholowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1866
  2. M. K. & T. Railway Co. v. City of Fort ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  3. Kansas Pacific Rly. Co. v. SalmonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  4. Phillips v. ReitzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  5. Major v. MajorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1864

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bisagno v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. Hubbard v. MeekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Hubbard v. MeekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Orendorff v. Brown Bed Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  5. Phillips v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API