Major v. Major
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Shawnee County: The facts, of the case sufficiently appear to present the points determined by the Court, in its opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Kingman, J.
Various issues were made up in this case, and a jury being waived were tried by the Court. The finding of the Court was general, to which the plaintiff in error excepted and brings the case to this Court for revision. There was no motion for a new trial, no exceptions to the proceedings other than the one to the finding of the Court. We do not think the case comes to us in such a manner as will authorize us to determine that the decision of the Court below was erroneous.
The Code provides, Sec. 291, that, “ upon the trial of questions of fact by the Court, it shall not…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Fair v. Golden Rule Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
- Briggs v. EgganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Nichols v. CarterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
- Typer v. SooySupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Thompson v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1893
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.