Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Meek

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 11, 1916No. 4686PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Pottawatomie County; Chas. B. Wilson, Jr.,.Judge. Action by J. P. Hubbard against May 'Meek, administratrix of tbe estate of W. H. Meek, deceased, E. J. Dickerson, M. H. Tennison, and tbe Partners National Bank, a corporation. Judgment for defendants, 'and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DAVIS, C.

Tbe verdict of tbe jury was returned in tbe case and filed on July 20, 1912; motion for a new trial was filed by the defendants on July 23, 1912; judgment was rendered by tbe court on October 17, 1912, and on tbe same day the motion for a new trial was overruled. The judgment was filed in the trial court October 30. 1912. On the 17th of October, 1912, an order granting the plaintiff, for good cause shown, thirty days in which to make and serve case-made, and ten days in which to suggest amendments, and the same to be settled and signed on five days’ notice in writing by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Howard v. ArkansawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Cummings v. TateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Weeks v. MedlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  4. Chicago & Atchison Bridge Co. v. FowlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  5. Gross v. FunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. American Surety Co. v. WolseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Kolb v. HightowerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Home Builders Lumber Co. v. West, Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Langley v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API