Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. Doyle
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Mesa County Court.—Hon. Walter S. Sullivan, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garrigues
This action for damages is on account of the failure of the railroad company to produce and deliver a suitcase when it was called for, which it, as a common carrier had received as baggage for transportation.
1. The facts are admitted, and there is no conflict in the testimony. Mary M. Doyle came to Denver August 9, 1911 from her home at Clifton, Colorado, where she had purchased a round trip ticket over the D. & E. G. Eailroad. She started to return on the evening of the-14th and upon arriving at the Union Depot, first checked her suitcase to Clifton, and then went to the Pullman office to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Ouimit v. HenshawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1863
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. BoyceIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Marshall v. Pontiac, Oxford & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1891
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- P-W Investments, Inc. v. City of WestminsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Colorado Woman's College v. Bradford-Robinson Printing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1945
- Boggs v. McMickleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. McClintock-Field Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Cocquyt v. ShowerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.