Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. McClintock-Field Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 24, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Logan

Reversing.

'The appellee instituted suit against appellant in the Boyd circuit court, alleging that the agent of appellee, its traveling salesman, on the 21st day of April, 1924, boarded appellant’s passenger train at Mita and took passage to Allen, another station on appellant’s line of railway; that he paid to the conductor on the train his fare for such passage; and that at the same time he delivered to appellant for transportation to Allen the trunks in which he carried his samples, which trunks and contents were the property of appellee; that the trunks…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roth v. . Buffalo State Line R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railway Co. v. McGaheySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
  3. Cohen & Stryck v. Home Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Wald & Co. v. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  5. Louisville, Cincinnati & Lexington Railroad v. MahanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beaver Dam Coal Company v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Margolis v. Greyhound Eastern Greyhound LinesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API