Legal Opinion

Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Smith

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1891No. 6918PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MARR, Judge, Section A.

On the 28th day of May, 1888, the appellee ¡Nettie Smith filed suit in the District Court of Guadalupe County, and alleged that she took passage on the train of appellant at San Antonio on the 9th day of May, 1888, paid the usual fare between said'points, and checked her trunk to Seguin, the point of her destination; that she arrived at the Seguin depot between 5 and 6 o’clock in the afternoon; that the depot at Seguin is situated about one mile from the town proper, and that when she arrived at said depot she did not take charge of her trunk, deeming it unnecessary to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Camden & Amboy Railroad & Transportation Co. v. BelknapNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Hickox v. Naugatuck RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863
  3. Holloway v. Memphis, El Paso & Pacific RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Texas Mutual Life Insurance v. DavidgeTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. BoyceIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thornton v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Barker v. Security State Bank of BowieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. DoyleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  4. Fegtly v. Village Blacksmith Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API